Law Office of Melissa C. Marsh

Request a Same Day Telephone Consultation

Contact Us
Sherman Oaks, CA
Tel: 818-849-5206
Tel: 323-655-1002
E-mail: MMarsh

Search:
Home About Us
Areas of Practice
Articles Business Transactions Corporations Employment Law Internet-Computer Law Landlord-Tenant Limited Liability Company Partnerships Real Estate Law Trademark & Copyright Wills & Trusts
Testimonials Client Alerts Useful Links Contact Us
Request a Same Day Telephone Consultation
Visa Mastercard American Express PayPal

A A A

Your Legal Corner - Client Alert Blog

U.S. Supreme Court Rules on Employee Retaliation Claims

Written By: Melissa C. Marsh, Esq., California Attorney, February 2009 Add to Favorites
On January 29, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tenn., that §704(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (the anti-retaliation provision) not only applies to employees who bring a complaint, but also to employees who disclose information regarding inappropriate behavior or illegal conduct in response to questions posed during an employer’s internal investigation. Facts The Metro School District was performing an internal investigation into rumors that its employee relations director, Gene Hughes, had sexually harassed various employees. During the internal company investigation, the plaintiff (Crawford) who had worked for the Metro School District for 30 years reported that Hughes had sexually harassed her. Although the Metro School District took no action against Hughes, shortly after the investigation it fired Crawford alleging unrelated reasons. Crawford filed suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming that the Metro School District was retaliating against her for stating that Hughes had sexually harassed her.

Held. The anti-retaliation provision provided in §704(a) in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects an employee who speaks out about discrimination or harassment during a company’s internal investigation.

Implications for Employers.

The Crawford case greatly extends anti-retaliation protections afforded to employees under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Now, even employees who silently oppose illegal conduct, or whose disclosures to coworkers indirectly reach the employer, may be protected under the Act. To avoid or limit claims of retaliation, employers should exercise extreme caution before disciplining, or terminating, an employee who has even briefly mentioned inappropriate behavior, or illegal activity, committed by the employer or a coworker. In addition, employers should conduct and document annual employee performance reviews, as such performance evaluations can provide documentation supporting performance problems that pre-exist any “protected” statements later made by an employee.


Tags: retaliation, termination, wrongful
Posted In: Employment Law News 


If you would like to inquire about my services, please call 818-849-5206.
If you have additional questions or need specific legal advice tailored to your specific needs, please schedule a low cost Telephone Consultation.


Disclaimer: The information presented on this web site was prepared by Melissa C. Marsh for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided in my articles and alerts should not be relied upon, or used as a substitute for professional legal advice from an attorney you retain to advise or represent you. Your use of this Internet site does not create an attorney- client relationship. Transmission of this article is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. All uses of the contents of this site, other than personal uses, are prohibited. You may print or email a copy of any information posted on this web site for your own personal, non-commercial, use, but you may not publish any of the articles or posts on this web site without the Express Written Permission of Melissa C. Marsh.


Home | Request a Consultation | Practice Areas | Articles | Client Alerts | Testimonials | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright© 1998 - 2024, Melissa C. Marsh. All Rights Reserved.
Website Design By DK Web Design
Catering By Devon Eats

Located in Los Angeles, California, the Law Office of Melissa C. Marsh handles business law and corporation law matters as a lawyer for clients throughout Los Angeles including Burbank, Sherman Oaks, Studio City, Valley Village, North Hollywood, Woodland Hills, Hollywood, West LA as well as Riverside County, San Fernando, Ventura County, and Santa Clarita. Attorney Melissa C. Marsh has considerable experience handling business matters both nationally and internationally. We routinely assist our clients with incorporation, forming a California corporation, forming a California llc, partnership, annual minutes, shareholder meetings, director meetings, getting a taxpayer ID number (EIN), buying a business, selling a business, commercial lease review, employee disputes, independent contractors, construction, and personal matters such as preparing a will, living trust, power of attorney, health care directive, and more.